Search Results

You searched for:
Label: John 1966

Results: 1-1 of 1

Show all data

  • Metadata

    John 1966. John, E., Orbis Britanniae and Other Studies (Leicester, 1966). 97 charters cited.

    • S 29. Comments, on identification of donor, p. 23 n.
    • S 34. Comments, cited, p. 25
    • S 45. Comments, mainly genuine, p. 91
    • S 49. Comments, authentic, p. 25
    • S 54. Comments, confirmations of Mercian kings perhaps suspicious, p. 24
    • S 55. Comments, pp. 23-4
    • S 58. Comments, cited with reference to Offa, p. 24
    • S 70. Comments, not in the ordinary sense a forgery, much more an incompetent foundation history based on authentic contemporary material, pp. 83-5
    • S 89. Comments, on royal style, pp. 8, 86-7, 105
    • S 90. Comments, treats MS 1 as contemporary, p. 17
    • S 92. Comments, on immunity, p. 107 n.
    • S 94. Comments, authentic, pp. 105-6
    • S 96. Comments, on royal style, p. 52
    • S 105. Comments, cited, p. 25
    • S 113. Comments, cited, p. 24
    • S 116. Comments, probably genuine, p. 52
    • S 121. Comments, formulation based on 8th-century material, p. 52
    • S 127. Comments, on royal style, p. 52
    • S 139. Comments, respectable, p. 107 n.
    • S 140. Comments, cited, p. 25
    • S 153. Comments, on royal style; original, pp. 21, 74
    • S 155. Comments, p. 88
    • S 186. Comments, original, discusses immunity clause, p. 107 n.
    • S 230. Comments, interpolated but probably basically genuine, p. 105
    • S 232. Comments, probably substantially authentic, p. 105
    • S 265. Comments, on history of Bath, p. 88
    • S 328. Comments, on issues of land-tenure, pp. 71 n., 106-8, 113-17
    • S 333. Comments, p. 41 n
    • S 346. Comments, on royal style, p. 45
    • S 347. Comments, on royal style, p. 45
    • S 348. Comments, on royal style, p. 45
    • S 354. Comments, on royal style, p. 45
    • S 355. Comments, on royal style, p. 45
    • S 356. Comments, on royal style, p. 45
    • S 396. Comments, on royal style, p. 49
    • S 397. Comments, on royal style, p. 49
    • S 400. Comments, on formulation, p. 49
    • S 404. Comments, on royal style, p. 53
    • S 406. Comments, later forgery, p. 53
    • S 410. Comments, spurious, p. 51
    • S 430. Comments, on royal style, pp. 53-4
    • S 431. Comments, on royal style, pp. 53-4
    • S 434. Comments, should be treated with reserve, p. 50 n.
    • S 435. Comments, should be treated with reserve, p. 50 n.
    • S 436. Comments, certainly a fabrication, p. 50 n.
    • S 448. Comments, on royal style, p. 54
    • S 478. Comments, on royal style, no suspicious features except Archbishop Oda's attestation, pp. 54-5
    • S 548. Comments, on royal style, p. 55
    • S 550. Comments, on royal style, p. 55
    • S 566. Comments, on royal style, authenticity not in doubt, p. 55
    • S 567. Comments, should have benefit of doubt, pp. 195-6
    • S 597. Comments, on formulation, p. 182
    • S 654. Comments, genuine, discusses estate history, pp. 197-8
    • S 658. Comments, substantially authentic, discusses Orthodoxorum formulation, pp. 186-209, esp. 188-94
    • S 673. Comments, interpolated, pp. 181-209, esp. pp. 194-8
    • S 690. Comments, on formulation of Oswald's subscription, pp. 182-3
    • S 731. Comments, partly authentic, pp. 58-9, 71-2 n., 163-4, 237-43, 263-4
    • S 745. Comments, extraordinary but original, pp. 271-5
    • S 776. Comments, probably fabricated, dating clause and witness-list from S 779, pp. 210-33, esp. pp. 232-3
    • S 777. Comments, authentic, discusses witnesses, pp. 202-3
    • S 779. Comments, on royal style; Latin text substantially authentic, vernacular version of later date, pp. 58, 210-33
    • S 781. Comments, authentic, pp. 202-3
    • S 786. Comments, authentic, MS 1 original, pp. 181-209, esp. pp. 199-206
    • S 788. Comments, crude Worcester fabrication, pp. 181-209, esp. pp. 206-7
    • S 796. Comments, p. 280
    • S 797. Comments, on royal style, certainly authentic, pp. 58, 280
    • S 798. Comments, forged, p. 108
    • S 812. Comments, substantially authentic, pp. 181-204, esp. pp. 198-9
    • S 818. Comments, difficult but probably authentic, p. 207 n.
    • S 823. Comments, on royal style, p. 58
    • S 827. Comments, pp. 58, 279-80
    • S 838. Comments, no reason to doubt authenticity, p. 208 n.
    • S 876. Comments, entirely authentic, pp. 172, 181-209
    • S 911. Comments, p. 208 n.
    • S 1172. Comments, mainly authentic, p. 91
    • S 1184. Comments, cited, p. 25
    • S 1211. Comments, on background, p. 174 n.
    • S 1257. Comments, on background, pp. 24, 86-9
    • S 1258. Comments, on political background, pp. 88-9
    • S 1264. Comments, on legal background, pp. 25, 88
    • S 1265. Comments, pp. 165-6
    • S 1290. Comments, discusses issue of lease to member of familia, pp. 164-5
    • S 1308. Comments, on witness-list, p. 262 n.
    • S 1321. Comments, has been tampered with, pp. 259-62
    • S 1327. Comments, cited, p. 246
    • S 1329. Comments, slightly adapted by cartularist, pp. 261-2
    • S 1336. Comments, on leasing of land to a monk, pp. 245-6
    • S 1342. Comments, on beneficiary, p. 246
    • S 1369. Comments, on beneficiary, p. 246
    • S 1370. Comments, witness-list belongs to 966, p. 243
    • S 1374. Comments, p. 246
    • S 1411. Comments, on background, p. 24
    • S 1429. Comments, on legal background, pp. 85-6
    • S 1438. Comments, contemporary, p. 37
    • S 1445. Comments, on lawsuit, p. 148-50
    • S 1507. Comments, pp. 42-3
    • S 1515. Comments, p. 43